Being the face of the casino industry for over two centuries, the traditional game of roulette has been linked to a number of myths. We shall dedicate some time to discussing the most popular ones among them.
Myth: Roulette Results Are Predictable
A fair roulette game is treated as a game of chance. On a single-zero wheel, each of the 37 numbers has a probability of 1/37 on each spin; on a double-zero wheel, it is 1/38. A physical wheel follows mechanical laws, but this does not make its next winning number reliably predictable to an ordinary player.
Mechanical defects can sometimes affect a wheel’s results. A suspected defect needs careful evidence; a short streak or a frequently appearing number is not proof. Normal wear does not establish that a wheel has an exploitable bias.
Myth: Every Physical Wheel Is Identical
The components of a roulette wheel, its condition and the ball can differ between tables. Those differences do not by themselves show that any number has a favourable probability. A fair wheel’s expected payouts follow its rules and number of pockets.
Best Online Roulette Bonuses for Australians
Shazam Casino
$ 50
Black Lotus Casino
300% up to
$7,000
+ 45 Spins
Lucky Creek
200% up to
$/€7,500
Grand Eagle
200% up to
$5,500
+ 30 Spins
Treasure Mile
200% up to
$/€4,000
+ 50 Spins
Jazz Casino
200% up to
$2,000
+ 100 Spins
Bovada Casino
100% up to
$1,000
Ignition Casino
200% up to
$100
Slots.lv
100% up to
$2,000
+ 20 Spins
Slots And Casino
500% up to
∞
+ 150 Spins
Myth: The Number 666 Changes the Game
The numbers 1 through 36 add up to 666 because 36 × 37 / 2 = 666. Adding zero or double zero does not change that sum. The arithmetic has no supernatural significance and does not predict a spin. The extra pocket in American roulette changes the probabilities, not the sum.
Myth: A Dealer Can Reliably Choose the Winning Number
A dealer’s routine or a run of similar results is not evidence of reliable control over the winning pocket. Claims about steering the ball need controlled testing. Players should not assume that a particular dealer can provide a predictable advantage.
Myth: A Staking System Removes the House Edge
Changing stakes does not change a fair spin’s probabilities or the table’s payouts. A system that doubles after losses can produce many small winning cycles and occasional much larger losses, with a finite bankroll and table limit preventing unlimited doubling. No staking sequence turns a negative expected return into a positive one.
Roulette Tournaments
Roulette Myths
Roulette Etiquette
How to Rig a Roulette Wheel
European Roulette
Myth: A Previous Spin Makes a Number Due
On a fair wheel with independent spins, previous outcomes do not change the next spin’s probabilities. Ten red results in a row do not make black due. The belief that losses or missing numbers must soon be balanced is the gambler’s fallacy.
A statistical investigation into a suspected mechanical defect is a different question from predicting fair spins from their history. It needs a suitable sample and testing method; a list of recent winning numbers is not a dependable betting signal.
Further reading: Gambling Commission standards for random outcomes.
